First, on all the Rolleiflex models, you will find no light sealing foam. Let’s see what the newer Rolleiflex models offer. But when stopped down, I doubt you could find any real world difference. I.e., Zeiss Planar is sharper than a Tessar. All performed to varying degrees of contrast and sharpness. The differences between the letter designations is pretty minor until the FX.
But let’s get back to the classics Rolleiflex 2.8F and Rolleiflex 3.5. I’ve never actually seen those two, and am not sure they are available in every country. Plus, they have two other cheaper models, the Rolleiflex 4.0 FW and the Rolleiflex 4.0 FT. It’s an opinion that is treated as fact because it comes from so many sources online. In fact, the new 80mm Zeiss Planar lens on the FX is considered even sharper than the original 2.8F! How that is possible, I don’t know. So, you have to love TLR’s.īruce Weber,….When only sleeping with your Rolleiflexes will do. It is a new company, DHW Fototechnik, but they have advanced the line while keeping the build quality. Like the cover photo of a gold plated GX “Royal” sitting next to a Rolleiflex FX model. But discounting their naming conventions, I don’t think there is another camera in any format with that long of a run. Yes, I know there’s an older Rolleiflex GX.maybe the Germans don’t know ‘F’ comes before ‘G’. I think the Rolleiflex TLR FX-N, which was introduced at Photokina in 2012, was the latest model.
0 kommentar(er)
